![]() ![]() Most obviously, in an era of financial uncertainty, there is the risk of overstretch if nations try to do too much with limited resources however, this approach also presents an opportunity to find greater effectiveness through crossdomain operations and closer integration with regional partners. There are both risks and benefits to smaller nations adopting such an approach. The recent US Joint Operation Access Concept outlines requirements for high-end contingent capabilities networked across multiple domains to meet emerging anti-access and area-denial threats. AJP-3.4.4 Allied Joint Doctrine for Counter-Insurgency (COIN) AJP-3.4.5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Military Contribution to Stabilization and Reconstruction AJP-3.5 Allied Joint Doctrine for Special Operations AJP-3.6 Allied Joint Doctrine for Electronic Warfare AJP-3. AJP-2 Joint Intelligence,Counter Intelligence and Security Doctrine AJP-01 (B) Allied Joint Doctrine 12.02. This paper, looking at cross-domain capabilities and interoperability, is the result of the second workshop and explores some of the concepts, capabilities and force structures that might be adopted. Nato Ajp 2.7 Pdf - fasrkin NATO Glossary of Abbreviations Used in NATO Documents and Publications 5a. RUSI and the RAF convened two workshops to look at the evolving relationship between the RAF and industry in the light of the new structural changes within the UK Ministry of Defence, and the implications of the US Joint Operational Access Concept – and associated Air-Sea Battle and Joint Forced Entry Concepts – for the UK and other forces.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |